Sentiment analysis uses four quantitative variables to assess the real-time state of market participants. Each provides a different lens on the same market: who is paying, who is adding positions, who is more aggressive, and how far the market has drifted from equilibrium. Individually they provide hints. Together they provide conviction.
Variable 1 — Funding Rate: cost to hold long or short on perpetual swap exchanges; extremes signal participant exhaustion
Variable 2 — Open Interest: total open contracts; relationship to price direction signals trend strength or dangerous divergence
Variable 3 — Cumulative Delta: net market buys minus market sells; imbalances show who is aggressively off-sides
Variable 4 — Futures Basis: spread between spot price and futures price; contango and backwardation extremes signal exhaustion
None are 100% reliable standalone signals — they must combine with TA and with each other for maximum effect
All four pointing the same direction = maximum confluence; even two or three aligned signals significantly raise conviction
Lesson
How the Four Variables Work Together for Maximum Confluence
The power of sentiment analysis comes from variable alignment. When multiple independent variables confirm the same trade thesis, their agreement is not coincidental — it reflects a genuine and extreme imbalance in the market. A single variable is a hint. Two is a signal. Three or four is a high-conviction trade.
Funding alone: useful but easily misread without price and level context
OI alone: tells you whether positions are growing or shrinking; needs price direction for meaningful interpretation
Cumulative Delta alone: shows who is more aggressive right now; can be noise without TA context
Futures Basis alone: shows drift from equilibrium; needs trend context to be useful
All four bearish: funding positive (longs paying), OI rising as price rises then stalls (longs adding), delta very green at resistance (longs aggressive at wrong level), contango extreme (market stretched) = maximum conviction short at SSR
All four bullish: funding negative (shorts paying), OI rising as price falls (shorts adding), delta very red at support (shorts at wrong level), backwardation extreme = maximum conviction long at DBS
Check Yourself
A trader sees all four sentiment variables at extreme readings and all pointing bullishly at a key DBS support zone. Funding is extreme negative, OI rising with falling price, cumulative delta extreme red, and the futures basis is deep backwardation. Compared to a setup where only one SA variable is mildly elevated, how should position sizing differ?
Maximum position size on the four-variable alignment — all four independently agree with the TA setup; this represents the highest possible conviction within the framework; size should reflect that; mildly elevated single-variable setups warrant significantly reduced size
Same position size for both — position size should always be fixed and determined only by the TA setup; SA variable count does not change the risk-to-reward ratio and therefore should not affect size
Smaller position size on the four-variable alignment — too many variables pointing the same way is a contrarian indicator; when everyone and every indicator agrees the market will do the opposite
Answer it (with a live chart) in the interactive lesson.
Liquidity Theory · Learn · Analyze · Trade together Educational content only — trading involves substantial risk and most beginners lose money. Nothing here is financial advice.